|
|
Post by CC on Mar 30, 2007 2:44:03 GMT -5
Before the deal, Magic cut three.
then...
Grizzlies trade:
Scott Padgett
Brian Cardinal
Hakim Warrick
Chucky Atkins
Damon Stoudamire
Magic trade:
Grant Hill
then...
Grizzlies sign any FA vet.
Grizzlies trade:
FA Vet
Magic trade:
Jameer Nelson
Grizzlies confirm.
Reason: Fat expiring and a young starting PG.
|
|
|
|
Post by lumley316 on Mar 30, 2007 2:46:08 GMT -5
Magic Confirm
Waive
Bo Outlaw
Pat Garrity
Linton Johnson
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Mar 30, 2007 3:08:42 GMT -5
Okay, I think we can all agree this Magic GM is downright atrocious. What an awful trade for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by scott on Mar 30, 2007 3:09:55 GMT -5
In fact, he should be fired for this. It's beyond horrible. How in the fuck does this possibly benefit the Magic?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rod Blagojevich on Mar 30, 2007 11:50:04 GMT -5
Lumley should be fired? You've been involved for what, three days, and he should be fired?
|
|
|
|
Post by jeremybl on Mar 30, 2007 11:53:53 GMT -5
i agree with scott, deal easily favors memphis. nelson is gonna be a solid contributor immediately and hill is a nice scorer.
|
|
|
|
Post by jahallstar on Mar 30, 2007 11:57:20 GMT -5
eww I don't understand this for the Magic at all. They basically took on contracts and gave up Nelson for nothing in return.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 30, 2007 11:57:44 GMT -5
This is a horrible trade by Lums. Expiring contracts are huge in any league, and Hill has the biggest around. I think Nelson is also a very good player. Lumley gets almost nothing of value, and picks up huge bad contracts. its just a bad deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by bossplaya on Mar 30, 2007 12:09:33 GMT -5
^ yeah that pretty much sums it up.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 30, 2007 12:49:53 GMT -5
it is not that bad considering jameer nelson hasnt proved anything, even his ratings blow. So we can not say that this is 100% a horrible trade. It is just because the names of the players have everyone when in fact this trade is not that bad at all. its far far away from firing a person and its far away from being rejected. Lumley gets role players, and cc gets what he wants.. leave it as that. nobody is getting fired.
|
|
|
|
Post by duce on Mar 30, 2007 13:17:50 GMT -5
dan even though you maybe right, that doesn't mean he benifits from the deal. you're supposed to work at making your team better, that's the goal.
firing is a little drastic though, yeah.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 30, 2007 13:34:24 GMT -5
yeah i know you are suppose to benift your team each trade, maybe hes doing this to set up aonther, who knows. all im saying is, you can not fire a guy for this. now trading like kg or dirk or someone for scrubs is another story.
|
|
|
|
Post by nybombers3 on Mar 30, 2007 13:38:17 GMT -5
BBS type tanking in UOSL?
BRILLIANT!
|
|
|
|
Post by mrheadofstate on Mar 30, 2007 13:40:23 GMT -5
This is horrible... not because of the players names... not because of their ratings... but because of the contracts. You guys say this guy lumly is a good GM, so I'd like to see what moves he follows up with after this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by JUICE on Mar 30, 2007 14:38:11 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't really understand this one.
|
|
