|
|
Post by Play on Sept 8, 2008 0:06:07 GMT -5
#1. Allonzo Trier PG 20 6'4'' 208 B- B+ A- A- C AProjected Prime Ratings: B+ A A A+ C+ C Really? B+ A A A+ C+ C? High hopes, much?  i'm biased |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Sept 8, 2008 0:17:28 GMT -5
I didn't notice.  |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Sept 8, 2008 0:32:57 GMT -5
I Figured  |
|
|
|
Post by jusstaddwatrr on Sept 8, 2008 12:35:48 GMT -5
nice seeing mcleary on the list. what do you think his prime projected ratings will be?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Sept 8, 2008 13:34:42 GMT -5
He's still living 5 years ago. Dawkins is ridiculous. I was joking with my comment but seriously find me a guard in this league with the ratings he has. He's a legit 28/8 at PG as a 1st option, look at his stats when he was. Turnovers were an issue when he first came into the league but he's toned it down. The only PG's I'd rather have are Rubio and Kyle Anderson |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Sept 8, 2008 14:44:46 GMT -5
Dawkins is a beast..
It's crazy to think I had Dawkins, Anderson and Wills all on the roster at once.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ducky on Sept 8, 2008 14:48:18 GMT -5
Nooo what's crazy, play, is how no one would give shit for Dawkins..
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Sept 8, 2008 16:09:23 GMT -5
Nooo what's crazy, play, is how no one would give shit for Dawkins.. True, I tried hard as hell to deal Dawkins after a few TCs because I was trying to win now. lol Saga wouldn't give the pick he selected Rip Engel with and C.C. wouldn't give his pick for him either. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Sept 8, 2008 17:09:28 GMT -5
Nooo what's crazy, play, is how no one would give shit for Dawkins.. True, I tried hard as hell to deal Dawkins after a few TCs because I was trying to win now. lol Saga wouldn't give the pick he selected Rip Engel with and C.C. wouldn't give his pick for him either. damn that is nuts |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Sept 8, 2008 19:46:59 GMT -5
nice seeing mcleary on the list. what do you think his prime projected ratings will be? updated |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Sept 23, 2008 0:08:56 GMT -5
overlanders prime's ratings worse than his current? doesn't prime mean 'best'? Clark Overlander SG 23 6'7'' 205 B- A- B- B C- D He's declining already...He's good but you overrate him. He won't be a star. |
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Sept 23, 2008 0:13:52 GMT -5
overlanders prime's ratings worse than his current? doesn't prime mean 'best'? Clark Overlander SG 23 6'7'' 205 B- A- B- B C- D He's declining already...He's good but you overrate him. He won't be a star. I dont even overrate him. I hang onto him because he's a good player. But the word "prime" means "best". if 'prime' meant 'age 27 or age 30' then you're probably right about the lower grades. but wouldnt it make sense to just say his prime is now.....or then |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Sept 23, 2008 0:17:11 GMT -5
Clark Overlander SG 23 6'7'' 205 B- A- B- B C- D He's declining already...He's good but you overrate him. He won't be a star. I dont even overrate him. I hang onto him because he's a good player. But the word "prime" means "best". if 'prime' meant 'age 27 or age 30' then you're probably right about the lower grades. but wouldnt it make sense to just say his prime is now.....or then Yeah he's good but when i asked for him the only player you mentioned was Trier. |
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Sept 23, 2008 15:45:33 GMT -5
I dont even overrate him. I hang onto him because he's a good player. But the word "prime" means "best". if 'prime' meant 'age 27 or age 30' then you're probably right about the lower grades. but wouldnt it make sense to just say his prime is now.....or then Yeah he's good but when i asked for him the only player you mentioned was Trier. Claybrin's good too but what do you expect? |
|
|
|
Post by Play on Dec 24, 2008 6:03:40 GMT -5
#1. Allonzo Trier PG 20 6'4'' 208 B- B+ A- A- C AProjected Prime Ratings: B+ A A A+ C+ C Really? B+ A A A+ C+ C? High hopes, much? oops sorry I was wrong Allonzo Trier PG 24 6'5'' 208 A- A A+ A C C Looks even better |
|
