|
|
Post by w6602876 on Oct 28, 2008 21:46:48 GMT -5
A- Ricky Roberts (Temple) PG 22 5'11'' 178 C A- B C+ C B B+ Eric Seaberry (Texas) PG 21 6'1'' 205 C+ C+ B- C+ C A i looked at one page and found two better guards to take. Now Seaberry was a nice steal but still, Roberts was taken right after peters. Yea I agree both players are really good but Nova said Peters was a top five pick and I needed a PF at number 5 since I didn't have one on my team. |
|
|
|
Post by gotrunks226 on Oct 28, 2008 23:02:19 GMT -5
Seaberry = definition of a risk and steal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Oct 29, 2008 0:19:04 GMT -5
Seaberry = definition of a risk and steal. stfu...He had a B+ |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Oct 29, 2008 15:00:18 GMT -5
A- Ricky Roberts (Temple) PG 22 5'11'' 178 C A- B C+ C B B+ Eric Seaberry (Texas) PG 21 6'1'' 205 C+ C+ B- C+ C A i looked at one page and found two better guards to take. Now Seaberry was a nice steal but still, Roberts was taken right after peters. Yea I agree both players are really good but Nova said Peters was a top five pick and I needed a PF at number 5 since I didn't have one on my team. I think you needed a lot of things on that team, and still do. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Oct 30, 2008 0:49:47 GMT -5
more votes please..
|
|
|
|
Post by Play on Oct 30, 2008 1:15:06 GMT -5
A- Ricky Roberts (Temple) PG 22 5'11'' 178 C A- B C+ C B B+ Eric Seaberry (Texas) PG 21 6'1'' 205 C+ C+ B- C+ C A i looked at one page and found two better guards to take. Now Seaberry was a nice steal but still, Roberts was taken right after peters. Yea I agree both players are really good but Nova said Peters was a top five pick and I needed a PF at number 5 since I didn't have one on my team. Who cares what Nova said? Seems like you keep trying to blame Nova....It's nobody fault that you can't draft. |
|
|
|
Post by Ducky on Oct 30, 2008 1:28:49 GMT -5
btw here's whos voted:
Ducky
tmaczdaddy
w6602876
DB
Bluedevil$
gotrunks226
donatello2424
ApNeDtRiEeW
Play
If u plan to write an article on the future, and ur not on this list, expect to not get any points for ur articles..
|
|
|
|
Post by gotrunks226 on Oct 30, 2008 1:35:15 GMT -5
btw here's whos voted: Ducky tmaczdaddy w6602876 DB Bluedevil$ gotrunks226 donatello2424 ApNeDtRiEeW Play If u plan to write an article on the future, and ur not on this list, expect to not get any points for ur articles.. Ducky layin the smack down.. |
|
|
|
Post by w6602876 on Oct 30, 2008 7:59:04 GMT -5
I don't blame anyone, I see it like it is and what is written down in the draft notes. Peters was a PF, I didn't have a PF and last season when I asked who I should take instead of Peters before Seaberry and Roberts broke out, no one really had an answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Oct 30, 2008 13:55:09 GMT -5
+4 Youri Wright Post Defense
|
|
|
|
Post by gotrunks226 on Oct 30, 2008 16:08:22 GMT -5
Just a question.. so if u write an article.. u get a buyout plus an upgrade?
|
|
|
|
Post by jusstaddwatrr on Oct 30, 2008 16:18:37 GMT -5
Just a question.. so if u write an article.. u get a buyout plus an upgrade? i believe its one or the other. |
|
|
|
Post by CC on Oct 30, 2008 16:21:20 GMT -5
yeah it's one or the other
you cant write an article to use for both
|
|
|
|
Post by Ducky on Oct 30, 2008 16:26:02 GMT -5
yeah it's one or the other you cant write an article to use for both |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 30, 2008 17:35:31 GMT -5
+4 Youri Wright Post DefenseNo change. |
|
