|
|
Post by CC on Nov 21, 2008 13:00:58 GMT -5
hornets cant back out. you guys need to work it out unless knicks is fine with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:02:09 GMT -5
Doesn't even come close to working.. the checker says it works... he would have to add, right? He has 6 mill in cap space, so I don't see why it wouldn't work... |
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:02:30 GMT -5
hornets cant back out. you guys need to work it out unless knicks is fine with it. i'm not fine with it... it would be pretty lame of him to back out because of a bad 1st sim. |
|
|
|
Post by w6602876 on Nov 21, 2008 13:09:48 GMT -5
pretty lame to make him accept the trade after it didn't go through the first sim, he's already at a disadvantage with his poor record without kyle, unless the pick is protected I don't see why he should deal a first round pick from this season
|
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:13:17 GMT -5
Pretty lame of him to back out of the deal just because of some misfortune.
What makes you think his team can't better in the shitty Eastern conference when he has Kyle Anderson? Everyone's trying rebuild.
|
|
|
|
Post by w6602876 on Nov 21, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Pretty lame of him to back out of the deal just because of some misfortune. What makes you think his team can't better in the shitty Eastern conference when he has Kyle Anderson? Everyone's trying rebuild. This misfortune isn't his fault. Both of you should have checked out to make sure this should have worked with a calculator. Trade Checkers don't work when teams have cap space, this is obvious. Why you decided to use it anyway is beyond me. Trying to justify the fact that he plays in a weak conference doesn't correlate to a reason to why the trade should be validated. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 21, 2008 13:25:52 GMT -5
Yeah trade checker starts to fuck up when you factor in cap space.
I'll tell you how much it is off.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Nov 21, 2008 13:28:30 GMT -5
It's off by around two million. Heavy on the Knicks end.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:38:13 GMT -5
Pretty lame of him to back out of the deal just because of some misfortune. What makes you think his team can't better in the shitty Eastern conference when he has Kyle Anderson? Everyone's trying rebuild. This misfortune isn't his fault. Both of you should have checked out to make sure this should have worked with a calculator. Trade Checkers don't work when teams have cap space, this is obvious. Why you decided to use it anyway is beyond me. Trying to justify the fact that he plays in a weak conference doesn't correlate to a reason to why the trade should be validated. The reason why the trade should be validated is because he accepted the deal. The fact that conditions might have change is not my fault. Obviously things can change, because a Anderson/Seaberry-led team in the Eastern Conference is easily playoff-caliber. I wasn't trying to justify why the trade would be validated, but just explaining how the conditions can easily change. |
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:40:49 GMT -5
It's off by around two million. Heavy on the Knicks end. so he would have to add about 2 million, correct? |
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:42:01 GMT -5
Pretty lame of him to back out of the deal just because of some misfortune. What makes you think his team can't better in the shitty Eastern conference when he has Kyle Anderson? Everyone's trying rebuild. This misfortune isn't his fault. Both of you should have checked out to make sure this should have worked with a calculator. So the misfortune is part his fault. Way to contradict yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by w6602876 on Nov 21, 2008 13:42:14 GMT -5
It's off by around two million. Heavy on the Knicks end. so he would have to add about 2 million, correct? Or you would have to decrease 2 million, he shouldn't have to add to a trade that is already in your favor. |
|
|
|
Post by Bluedevil$ on Nov 21, 2008 13:44:54 GMT -5
That's your opinion. Basone liked the deal for the Hornets.
I have no problem with decreasing 2 million.
|
|
|
|
Post by w6602876 on Nov 21, 2008 13:45:17 GMT -5
This misfortune isn't his fault. Both of you should have checked out to make sure this should have worked with a calculator. Trade Checkers don't work when teams have cap space, this is obvious. Why you decided to use it anyway is beyond me. Trying to justify the fact that he plays in a weak conference doesn't correlate to a reason to why the trade should be validated. The reason why the trade should be validated is because he accepted the deal. The fact that conditions might have change is not my fault. Obviously things can change, because a Anderson/Seaberry-led team in the Eastern Conference is easily playoff-caliber. I wasn't trying to justify why the trade would be validated, but just explaining how the conditions can easily change. The deal was made before the season started, giving up a first round pick that now has a potential to be a top 4 pick because a mess up that occurred of a mishandling on your end where you should have used a calculator instead of a trade checker. Unless the 2027 first round pick is protected, I don't see why this trade should go through. You are obviously desparate to get rid of him since no one even came close to making an offer like the Hornets did. As you mentioned yourself, no one saw much interest in him (paraphrasing there). |
|
|
|
Post by w6602876 on Nov 21, 2008 13:46:34 GMT -5
That's your opinion. Basone liked the deal for the Hornets. I have no problem with decreasing 2 million. Basone said this, "if some of those young guys can have some good tcs in the next season or two they will be looking pretty good in the east, maybe not the best, but a solid playoff team." No where did he mention that he liked the deal more for one end over the other. |
|
