|
|
Post by jayborne on Jan 9, 2009 15:48:21 GMT -5
Fantasy Draft + 1990 start sounds perfect IMO. Definitely. Although I won't be apart of it. This is my last season for real. Hopefully during mid-Spring the new UOSL is running well and I'll rejoin. |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 15:48:42 GMT -5
Random number generator can determine the order.. Sounds like a fair way. |
|
|
|
Post by zyme on Jan 9, 2009 15:56:30 GMT -5
Fantasy Draft + 1990 start sounds perfect IMO. Definitely. Although I won't be apart of it. This is my last season for real. Hopefully during mid-Spring the new UOSL is running well and I'll rejoin. I think that we should start with a draft. Whomever is last on the fantasy draft list should get the first pick in the amateur draft that year. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Jan 9, 2009 15:59:21 GMT -5
Fantasy Draft + 1990 start sounds perfect IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 16:04:06 GMT -5
Definitely. Although I won't be apart of it. This is my last season for real. Hopefully during mid-Spring the new UOSL is running well and I'll rejoin. I think that we should start with a draft. Whomever is last on the fantasy draft list should get the first pick in the amateur draft that year. So have them back to back? |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Jan 9, 2009 16:14:11 GMT -5
No. You'd make the fantasy draft snake selection.
|
|
|
|
Post by dwhitey724 on Jan 9, 2009 16:18:44 GMT -5
I like this as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 16:25:35 GMT -5
sounds cool
|
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Jan 9, 2009 17:18:30 GMT -5
fantasy draft is more fun
(waits for play to post the obligatory "get the fuck out of here")
|
|
|
|
Post by CC on Jan 9, 2009 17:29:03 GMT -5
Fantasy draft
|
|
|
|
Post by zyme on Jan 9, 2009 17:46:19 GMT -5
The problem is that even at position the ability to wheel is problematic, the best tallent is long off the board. My thought with the draft was to allow those teams to get depth with the wheel and to have a better future talent in the draft
top of the Fantasy draft: Good top end
Bottom end with good amateur draft:Good future talent and ballanced role players
I dont see how that is not balanced.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 18:01:21 GMT -5
The problem is that even at position the ability to wheel is problematic, the best tallent is long off the board. My thought with the draft was to allow those teams to get depth with the wheel and to have a better future talent in the draft top of the Fantasy draft: Good top end Bottom end with good amateur draft:Good future talent and ballanced role players I dont see how that is not balanced. Didnt understand one part of this. |
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Jan 9, 2009 18:07:20 GMT -5
The problem is that even at position the ability to wheel is problematic, the best tallent is long off the board. My thought with the draft was to allow those teams to get depth with the wheel and to have a better future talent in the draft top of the Fantasy draft: Good top end Bottom end with good amateur draft:Good future talent and ballanced role players I dont see how that is not balanced. Didnt understand one part of this. HAHA my thoughts exactly |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 18:09:19 GMT -5
The problem is that even at( OUT?) position( S?) the ability to wheel is problematic, the best tallent is long off the board. My thought with the draft was to allow those teams to get depth with the wheel( ON A CAR?) and to have a better future talent in the draft top of the Fantasy draft: Good top end Bottom end with good amateur draft:Good future talent and ballanced role players( SPANISH?) I dont see how that is not balanced. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 18:09:35 GMT -5
idk
|
|
