|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:52:41 GMT -5
Post by ashes on Jan 13, 2009 0:52:41 GMT -5
how is the buyout silly? I f a player is underpreforming his contract RL teams buy them out all the time. You see at least one buyout a year in the league. If we are to simulate RL why not. I don't like the way our system works though.. A buyout isn't necessarily a bad idea, but I just don't like the way we've implemented it. |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:54:16 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:54:16 GMT -5
I think a point system for posting+DC+articles would be nice. But nothing outside of that. It really depends on ashes. I'm for it as long as we don't cause rating inflation.
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 1:03:21 GMT -5
Post by zyme on Jan 13, 2009 1:03:21 GMT -5
Comparing this system to UOSL you get a larger improvment with this system. While in a good article you can get a +5 to an attribute with a max of +12/ year in bonuses (+10 with 2 good articles and a +2 misc for some other method, pick'em or giveaway). 60 points/year (± depending on the # of sims) is a good system but I would suggest that 10pts=a +2 with but only 2 upgrades can be given to a player/year.
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 4:08:03 GMT -5
Post by ib4 on Jan 13, 2009 4:08:03 GMT -5
what about bring back the bank like in UOSL1?
IMO this article incentive (+1 to +5 to players) stuff is meh. With a bank system, you can spend money on different things...earn it different ways....
what about a luxury tax? if we want to get more realistic...
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 4:11:37 GMT -5
Post by sagapolutele50 on Jan 13, 2009 4:11:37 GMT -5
I like IT hope we keep that going!!
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 4:14:46 GMT -5
Post by ib4 on Jan 13, 2009 4:14:46 GMT -5
I like IT hope we keep that going!! i actually did too, but why is IT limitted to one player? can we get the RNG for like 3-5 players? how realistic is it that only one player on an NBA team works extra hard in the offseason? |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 12:04:43 GMT -5
Post by zyme on Jan 13, 2009 12:04:43 GMT -5
Instead of the bonus from articles increased the players ratings dircetly, what if the number of points you accrued changed the #of IT you had open to you. If you can get around 60 points in a season, 15pts per IT (20 pts would still be the # to have an automatic +2/+3 on the player) would makes sense to provide more players access to IT.
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 12:12:41 GMT -5
Post by duceisinmyheart on Jan 13, 2009 12:12:41 GMT -5
A few things...
1) While it may be lame to completely copy from another league.. but I think the majority of the rules used in BBS should be implemented here. They are not perfect but they have proven to not only work but create constant activity.
2)Inflation should not be a problem if we control it. Have drafts that aren't as stacked, control potential, etc. Again, BBS has done a tremendous job of doing this at the moment.
3) Let's not make any rules or ideas that take an "extra effort" to do or are a bit complicated like the whole dollar system thing. We need to not only make this league easy accessible to all to achieve RCs but at the same time time and effort needs to be put it to truly gain valuable RCs.
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 12:15:21 GMT -5
Post by zyme on Jan 13, 2009 12:15:21 GMT -5
People who put effort into the league should also be rewarded for thier effort.
|
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 12:21:22 GMT -5
Post by w6602876 on Jan 13, 2009 12:21:22 GMT -5
How is everything fine? We've had the less posts in this season then any other season in UOSL2 history. You are retarded. You asked about rules, not how to get inactive people active. |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 15:11:57 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 15:11:57 GMT -5
A few things... 1) While it may be lame to completely copy from another league.. but I think the majority of the rules used in BBS should be implemented here. They are not perfect but they have proven to not only work but create constant activity. 2)Inflation should not be a problem if we control it. Have drafts that aren't as stacked, control potential, etc. Again, BBS has done a tremendous job of doing this at the moment. 3) Let's not make any rules or ideas that take an "extra effort" to do or are a bit complicated like the whole dollar system thing. We need to not only make this league easy accessible to all to achieve RCs but at the same time time and effort needs to be put it to truly gain valuable RCs. For the most part we already copy BBS rules, minus contract year and point system. (Both which will be in UOSLR). |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 15:12:39 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 15:12:39 GMT -5
How is everything fine? We've had the less posts in this season then any other season in UOSL2 history. You are retarded. You asked about rules, not how to get inactive people active. We should continue UOSL, but whatever. |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 15:41:44 GMT -5
Post by w6602876 on Jan 13, 2009 15:41:44 GMT -5
You asked about rules, not how to get inactive people active. We should continue UOSL, but whatever. Yea. Maybe taking advice from one of the most active GM in the league isn't a good idea. |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 16:44:24 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 16:44:24 GMT -5
Yea. Maybe taking advice from one of the most active GM in the league isn't a good idea. You may be active, but you suck at GMing. Worst team in UOSL2 history, not to mention least playoff appearances (5). Now I know that's not all your doing, but you chipped in handsomely. |
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 17:07:55 GMT -5
Post by Andrew on Jan 13, 2009 17:07:55 GMT -5
lol@ chipping in handsomely
: (
|
|
