|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 14:21:19 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jun 8, 2007 14:21:19 GMT -5
vote
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 14:23:37 GMT -5
Post by CC on Jun 8, 2007 14:23:37 GMT -5
fact
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 14:42:53 GMT -5
Post by duce on Jun 8, 2007 14:42:53 GMT -5
I don't even know how to answer this.
IMO:
-The West has more established teams overall.
-The East's top 4 are better than the West's top 4.
-The West has the best team in the league by a lot.
-The East has great GM/coaches that are capable of overachieving.
-The West has a couple more choker-style teams than the East.
I think each conference has their own positives and negatives. I guess the east is more reliable but what does it matter if the Spurs are winning it? I dunno...
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 16:48:26 GMT -5
Post by DB on Jun 8, 2007 16:48:26 GMT -5
fuck this fucking shit. fiction LAKERS RULEEEE
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 16:49:56 GMT -5
Post by jeremybl on Jun 8, 2007 16:49:56 GMT -5
tough call, but i feel their are more teams solid in the west than east.
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 16:56:08 GMT -5
Post by JUICE on Jun 8, 2007 16:56:08 GMT -5
FACT
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 17:17:27 GMT -5
Post by nova on Jun 8, 2007 17:17:27 GMT -5
Fiction. East is wayyy weaker then the West.
|
|
|
|
FoF
Jun 8, 2007 18:32:14 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jun 8, 2007 18:32:14 GMT -5
Fiction. East is wayyy weaker then the West. Maybe last year or the year before. But I think, like duce said, the top teams in the east >>> the top teams in the west. The west is a whole lot deeper, but if we are thinking championships, its either someone in the east or the spurs. *waits for dan to yell at him* |
|
