Ratings

[Ducky]

league ratings are inflated. FOF

This won't change the way I do drafts or anything, so don't be afraid to be honest. cheers

[duce]

they seem pretty low ducky.

i find myself adjusting my strategies to clamp down on teams, because they're just not as talented as they were before(and the ratings were very low to begin with in this league). i don't care how ya do drafts because i know your vision is in place but if you're worried about inflation then you're crazy.

[Ducky]

I'm not worried about inflation, but I just want to see the reaction from GMs.

Lower ratings require more GMing skills IMO. Less talent, harder to rebuild, harder to find depth, harder to win. It's more of a challenge, and this is why in my opinion, uosl will last for a loong time.

[duce]

i'd say if anything, there are too many good PGs(surprise). other than that it's pretty accurate.

[ib4]

llow-but-accurate ratings. good job Ducky. a big reason i like uosl2.

[jeremybl]

Overall the ratings are good, some surprise guys, but there are always suprises here and there in these types of leagues.

[allhailmaniac]

From what I've noticed there are a lack of just solid big men. Not superstar bigs, but solid.

[CC]

i like the ratings. i really think they are realistic especially when they start out low and then increase year by year. some show vast improvement, some do not. there are surprises as well. for example, morris almond (a 2nd rounder!) started out b- b- d+ c c- c something like that then all of a sudden exploded 2-3 years later to B B+ scoring and averaging 20 PPG! (as a starter/option obviously) But that shows how a player can start out real low but then it took patience to see him improve over time cuz i knew someday he would become a solid player. gm skills!

[ib4]

allhailmaniac said:

From what I've noticed there are a lack of just solid big men. Not superstar bigs, but solid.

cflip said:

i like the ratings. i really think they are realistic especially when they start out low and then increase year by year. some show vast improvement, some do not. there are surprises as well.

yup

[Bluedevil$]

I like the ratings here.. Despite being frustrated with some horrible picks, it actually makes drafting funner because not everything is a gimme. I think the lack of solid big men is fair, considering what the NBA looks like today.

[Ducky]

Yeah PGs are always overrated. It's very hard to keep them under control. But nice to hear mostly positive feed back.

[DB]

fiction, not at all. they are good though.