|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 13:48:26 GMT -5
Or we could go all out and just have a mix of players from all over. Guys from the 60's,70's,80's and 90's. Then we could keep going for alot longer and no one would know who was coming out in the draft. It would be just too mixed up and we would have some really good Draft classes. Plus it may add something to UOSL seeing no one has really ever done anything like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 13:55:33 GMT -5
Im gonna start a 90 file today. That seems like the year most people like.
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jan 9, 2009 13:56:37 GMT -5
Or we could go all out and just have a mix of players from all over. Guys from the 60's,70's,80's and 90's. Then we could keep going for alot longer and no one would know who was coming out in the draft. It would be just too mixed up and we would have some really good Draft classes. Plus it may add something to UOSL seeing no one has really ever done anything like that. I think a lot of GMs would lose interest and not want to join. Start in 90 or so and use draft classes that you make up. It might be a bit more research but you can push Kobe back a couple of years and say he went to college, maybe Shaq went all 4 years in college, ect. It gives you that flexibility and the classes do not have to mirror their real life counterparts. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jan 9, 2009 13:57:14 GMT -5
haha wow, you are a joke. You never had one good team worth mentioning. You never made it anywhere in the playoffs. Keep telling yourself lies. I made it to the conference finals and was up 3-1 before I lost. Nice try though, keep making stuff up. WAIT WHAT WAS THAT??? THE CONFERENCE FINALS 12 SEASONS AGO? awesome. nice FIVE playoff trips. |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 13:57:45 GMT -5
Or we could go all out and just have a mix of players from all over. Guys from the 60's,70's,80's and 90's. Then we could keep going for alot longer and no one would know who was coming out in the draft. It would be just too mixed up and we would have some really good Draft classes. Plus it may add something to UOSL seeing no one has really ever done anything like that. I think a lot of GMs would lose interest and not want to join. Start in 90 or so and use draft classes that you make up. It might be a bit more research but you can push Kobe back a couple of years and say he went to college, maybe Shaq went all 4 years in college, ect. It gives you that flexibility and the classes do not have to mirror their real life counterparts. cool |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 13:58:16 GMT -5
I made it to the conference finals and was up 3-1 before I lost. Nice try though, keep making stuff up. WAIT WHAT WAS THAT??? THE CONFERENCE FINALS 12 SEASONS AGO? awesome. nice FIVE playoff trips. lol nice |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 13:59:09 GMT -5
I think that Ducky and Ashes could probably use help with organization. Maybe you guys could decide who will be in charge of certain jobs. Like the posts job, if that is used. Possibly someone deciding who comes out earlier then expected, or later then expected. I also think the idea of an advanced history section with saved html would be nice. So possibly a history admin.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 13:59:52 GMT -5
The bad thing is this vote has been up for some time and we have just 15 votes. Some GM have not even seen this.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jan 9, 2009 14:01:13 GMT -5
In my original idea I was thinking that adding another small incentive for activity would be good. 100 posts a year for an IT. +1 to +5. I think posting breeds posting and activity. yeah this is a good thing to keep and add the posting incentive. Also, the article thing we got going now seems to be working a lot, I would keep that. |
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jan 9, 2009 14:02:07 GMT -5
I am always around to help, I can do whatever.
If we decide to go ahead with the team direction board, I can be in charge of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by ib4 on Jan 9, 2009 14:03:05 GMT -5
i say 1995
the year the raptors and grizzlies actually existed
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jan 9, 2009 14:03:06 GMT -5
1990 is looking like where we will start, I think it will be a good year to start in.
No we have to decide on a fantasy draft or not...
The draft maker will be in charge of who is coming out and who is staying in college.
I believe ashes will make the drafts? Or nova? Not sure who, well see.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Jan 9, 2009 14:03:27 GMT -5
Do you think UOSL has the GM base to do a CY? Sometimes BBS struggles finding GMs.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Jan 9, 2009 14:04:23 GMT -5
Do you think UOSL has the GM base to do a CY? Sometimes BBS struggles finding GMs. No, I really don't. But people liked the idea and thought we should do it. I do not think we should because it will hurt a lot of teams. Maybe a 5 year contract year? IDK though. |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Jan 9, 2009 14:05:52 GMT -5
1990 is looking like where we will start, I think it will be a good year to start in. No we have to decide on a fantasy draft or not... The draft maker will be in charge of who is coming out and who is staying in college. I believe ashes will make the drafts? Or nova? Not sure who, well see. Yeah 1990 sounds good. Plus we jsut need one guy to know who is coming out. It would help if he didn't have a team too. |
|
