|
|
Post by duce on Oct 13, 2007 14:28:07 GMT -5
Mike I don't know what you want. You're assuming a lot of things out of me, and acting like I never said anything to back up my opinion here.
Are you saying you disagree that Romo doesn't have the velocity? Are you serious that Favre doesn't know how to read coverages and he hasn't made ridiculously accurate impossible-like throws?
Kinda seems like you're reading too many Viking forums or something. Doesn't sound like somebody who watched Favre.
Also you saying you don't care if he has Owens, what does that really do for this discussion? You don't care, great. I guess it doesn't matter then, because you don't care. After all i described about Owens and what he does for Romo that no other receiver is really able to do...... you don't care. Nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Oct 13, 2007 15:16:26 GMT -5
All I'm saying is there is no wininng with this. Your always going to ahve something bad to say about Romo. You love TO soo you think the Reason Romo is any good is becuse of TO and thats fine. And What I was saying about Favre is he can read coverages but his not knowen for it. That not the big part of his game. Favre has alway been knowen to be a guy to trow the ball around and see what happens kind of guy. Favre is great. I just don't see why we are doing this. You will never say Romo is just a good QB and I'm never going to say he sucks. I'm not even a fan of Romo. Plus the reason Favre make ridiculously accurate impossible-like throws is becuse he has velocity. Any person that has played football oe has coach will tell you the same. Favre Has throwen more TD then any one but had also throwen more INT then anyone and there is a reason for that. People said the same thing about Favre as people say about Romo. They he makes too many wild throws and so on. Plus you did say somethings to back up Your opinion but I just don't think they all true. Just like I get he has TO but most QBs had a WR too. When it comes down to it there is no way to say that Romo is good or if he suck right now. Its one of them thing we both will find out in time.
|
|
|
|
Post by duce on Oct 13, 2007 15:55:44 GMT -5
You realize Favre played in the west coast offense right?
I mean, I just want the clarify this, because, if you can't pass read coverage on another level, you can not excel in that kind of offense. You especially can't win MVP awards that way. Maybe he's not known for it because of all the other crazy good things he's done but he's damn sure great at it.
Your point about velocity, was actually my point before. So if you're using it against me, I don't know what to say. Yes, he uses velocity to make the impossible throws. I mean, if you're not reading what I'm saying then I'm typing for nothing I guess dude. Romo doesn't have that velocity. That's really all there is to it. If romo was in a west coast offense, he'd be done.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Oct 13, 2007 17:34:55 GMT -5
Fine what ever. To me Romo has a good arm and is a good QB. Plus how do you know he does not have that velocity? I have seen him use use some great velocity to get the ball to people. Plus Farve can now read coverage but when he was Romo age he couldn't. Not many young QB can go out and read a teams coverage at frist. Then you say Favre plays West Coats offense and your right but the Cowboys offense is not the easy thing to run. Look we both think we know something about football and no one is going to win this soo I say we jsut stop what do you say?
|
|
|
|
Post by duce on Oct 13, 2007 18:30:16 GMT -5
How do I know? lol. I don't even know how to answer that, I've watched him play and it's not like he's Pennington but he's damn sure not Favre... that's all I'm saying there.
I'm not saying Dallas' offense is easy. My only point is that Favre's ability to read coverage is very good. Romo's - at times - is barely good enough even with a star WR.
And as for the whole "anyone could have a good receiver" thing... I just don't get it. I mean you'd have to literally not watch or not want to care to deny this. Those receivers are open all day. Everyone is covered by 1 man at most. To suggest that more than 3-4 QBs have that advantage in the NFL is a complete falsity.
Mike, I'm not denying half of what you say. I agree he's "good" performance wise and I agree he's over rated and under rated and that's just how it is. I agree he has potential and could be very good in the future. But I just can not agree that it would be this way without TO, and I can not agree that his ability is Favre-like. He might have Favre-mannerisms and that's a fair assessment but their abilities are not even close.
If you really want to drop this, that's fine with me but I'm not hurt if you aren't. I'm cool either way.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Oct 14, 2007 0:24:41 GMT -5
I mean we could keep going on and but what good would it be. Soo its just better if we drop it. I'm not mad and I still Think what I said is true just like you think what you said is true soo we are all good lol
|
|
