|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:35:40 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:35:40 GMT -5
Have any new rules we should add? Or should we get rid of old rules?
Post your ideas here.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:40:20 GMT -5
Post by w6602876 on Jan 13, 2009 0:40:20 GMT -5
I thought everything was fine, but that is just my opinion.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:42:55 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:42:55 GMT -5
How is everything fine? We've had the less posts in this season then any other season in UOSL2 history. You are retarded.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:44:58 GMT -5
Post by dwhitey724 on Jan 13, 2009 0:44:58 GMT -5
Do you think we should have a Contract Year like BBS?
It would definitely keep things competitive.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:46:11 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:46:11 GMT -5
Do you think we should have a Contract Year like BBS? It would definitely keep things competitive. I do but instead of 3 years, making the 4th the fire year... I wanna do 4 years with the 5th being the fire year. Thoughts?
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:46:43 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:46:43 GMT -5
And am I the only one that thinks the buyout idea is kinda stupid?
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:46:55 GMT -5
Post by PTstyle272 on Jan 13, 2009 0:46:55 GMT -5
A league website?
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:48:25 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:48:25 GMT -5
Would be nice, but not necessary IMO. In fact the leagues that I'm in that DO have a website, I never use it.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:48:47 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:48:47 GMT -5
Plus who would be willing to spend hours on a website? Doubt anyone would..
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:48:57 GMT -5
Post by PTstyle272 on Jan 13, 2009 0:48:57 GMT -5
Do you think we should have a Contract Year like BBS? It would definitely keep things competitive. I do but instead of 3 years, making the 4th the fire year... I wanna do 4 years with the 5th being the fire year. Thoughts? Agreed, 4 years is an adequate amount of time to build a team.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:49:17 GMT -5
Post by zyme on Jan 13, 2009 0:49:17 GMT -5
how is the buyout silly? I f a player is underpreforming his contract RL teams buy them out all the time. You see at least one buyout a year in the league. If we are to simulate RL why not.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:51:00 GMT -5
Post by zyme on Jan 13, 2009 0:51:00 GMT -5
Could we switch to a dollar system. It gives incentive for people to post ther depth charts an to participate in discussions.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:51:13 GMT -5
Post by Ducky on Jan 13, 2009 0:51:13 GMT -5
how is the buyout silly? I f a player is underpreforming his contract RL teams buy them out all the time. You see at least one buyout a year in the league. If we are to simulate RL why not. I don't like the way our system works though.. A buyout isn't necessarily a bad idea, but I just don't like the way we've implemented it.
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:51:42 GMT -5
Post by PTstyle272 on Jan 13, 2009 0:51:42 GMT -5
more smilies
|
|
|
IDEAS
Jan 13, 2009 0:52:27 GMT -5
Post by zyme on Jan 13, 2009 0:52:27 GMT -5
how is the buyout silly? I f a player is underpreforming his contract RL teams buy them out all the time. You see at least one buyout a year in the league. If we are to simulate RL why not. I don't like the way our system works though.. A buyout isn't necessarily a bad idea, but I just don't like the way we've implemented it. How would you suggest we do it better.
|
|